Back to Blog
    Experimentation Culture
    June 14, 20259 min read

    Experimentation Metrics Every Team Should Track

    Mike Johnson

    Mike Johnson

    Engineering Lead

    Share:

    Tracking the right metrics helps you understand whether your experimentation program is actually working. Here's the comprehensive list.

    Velocity Metrics

    Experiments Launched Per Month

    What it measures: How many experiments your team starts each month.

    Why it matters: Higher velocity means faster learning. Low velocity means missed opportunities.

    Benchmarks:

  1. Low maturity: 1-2 experiments/month
  2. Medium maturity: 4-8 experiments/month
  3. High maturity: 10+ experiments/month
  4. Experiments Completed Per Month

    What it measures: How many experiments reach statistical significance.

    Why it matters: Launched experiments only matter if they conclude. Track completion rate.

    Target: 80%+ of launched experiments should complete.

    Average Experiment Duration

    What it measures: Days from launch to decision.

    Why it matters: Long experiments tie up resources and delay learning.

    Target: Most experiments should conclude within 2-4 weeks.

    Time to First Experiment

    What it measures: Days from feature spec to experiment launch.

    Why it matters: Measures how embedded experimentation is in your development process.

    Target: New features should be experimentable within one sprint of completion.

    Quality Metrics

    Win Rate

    What it measures: Percentage of experiments that beat the control.

    Why it matters: Indicates hypothesis quality. Very high win rates suggest you're testing safe ideas.

    Healthy range: 25-40% win rate. Higher suggests you're not taking enough risks.

    Inconclusive Rate

    What it measures: Experiments that end without statistical significance.

    Why it matters: Too many inconclusive experiments waste resources.

    Target: Under 20% inconclusive rate.

    Prediction Accuracy

    What it measures: How often team members correctly predict outcomes.

    Why it matters: Indicates how well your team understands users.

    Track over time: Accuracy should improve as teams learn from experiments.

    Impact Metrics

    Decision Influence Rate

    What it measures: How often experiment results change product decisions.

    Why it matters: Experiments that don't influence decisions are wasted effort.

    Target: 70%+ of experiments should influence a decision (ship, don't ship, or iterate).

    Cumulative Metric Lift

    What it measures: Total improvement in key metrics from experiments.

    Why it matters: Shows the ROI of your experimentation program.

    Track: Conversion rate, revenue, engagement improvements from experiments over time.

    Bad Ship Prevention

    What it measures: Features that would have shipped but were stopped by experiment results.

    Why it matters: Preventing a bad feature can be worth more than shipping a good one.

    Track: Count of losing experiments that changed launch decisions.

    Culture Metrics

    Team Participation Rate

    What it measures: Percentage of team members who engage with experiments.

    Why it matters: Experimentation culture requires broad participation, not just the data team.

    Target: 60%+ of product team actively following experiments.

    Cross-Team Experiment Visibility

    What it measures: How aware teams are of other teams' experiments.

    Why it matters: Prevents duplicate experiments and spreads learnings.

    Measure: Survey or prediction participation from outside experiment owner's team.

    Hypothesis Source Diversity

    What it measures: Who generates experiment hypotheses.

    Why it matters: Best hypotheses come from diverse perspectives.

    Target: Hypotheses from PMs, engineers, designers, support, and customers.

    Engagement Metrics (with Gamification)

    Prediction Participation

    What it measures: Percentage of experiments receiving predictions.

    Why it matters: Shows engagement with the experimentation program.

    Target: 70%+ of experiments should receive predictions.

    Average Predictions Per Experiment

    What it measures: How many team members bet on each experiment.

    Why it matters: Higher participation means broader engagement.

    Target: Average of 5+ predictions per experiment for teams of 20.

    Leaderboard Engagement

    What it measures: How often team members check standings.

    Why it matters: Active leaderboard checking indicates program engagement.

    Track: Weekly active users on leaderboard page.

    Building Your Dashboard

    Start with these five essential metrics:

    • Experiments per month (velocity)
    • Win rate (quality)
    • Decision influence rate (impact)
    • Team participation (culture)
    • Prediction accuracy (engagement/learning)

    Add more metrics as your program matures. The goal is insight, not data overload.

    Tracking Tools

    Experimentation platforms: Amplitude Experiment, Statsig, LaunchDarkly provide velocity and quality metrics.

    Gamification platforms: ExperimentBets tracks participation, predictions, and leaderboard engagement.

    Custom dashboards: Use Looker, Mode, or similar for combined views.

    Spreadsheets: Start simple. A well-maintained spreadsheet beats an unused dashboard.

    metrics
    experimentation
    analytics
    measurement
    Share:
    Mike Johnson

    Mike Johnson

    Engineering Lead

    Mike has built data infrastructure and experimentation platforms at two fintech startups. He writes about the technical challenges of running experiments at scale.

    Get more insights like this

    Join product teams learning to build experimentation cultures.

    Related Articles